SOEZ vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -45.57% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -31.68% return.

SOEZ

• 1D: -4.36%
• 1M: -21.72%
• YTD: -45.57%
• 6M: -44.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -4.00%
• 1M: -21.07%
• YTD: -31.68%
• 6M: -31.50%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-45.57%	-11.69%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-31.68%	-4.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SOEZ and EZBC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

SOEZ vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOEZ	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.84	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.42	—

Drawdowns

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -52.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOEZ	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.14%	-52.44%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.26%	-52.44%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.76%	-16.95%	-15.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SOEZ	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.78%	44.40%	+26.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.78%	50.17%	+20.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.78%	50.17%	+20.61%

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOEZ and EZBC have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SOEZ vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOEZ and EZBC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SOEZ and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SOEZ or EZBC?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOEZ or EZBC?

SOEZ and EZBC have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOEZ or EZBC?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between SOEZ and EZBC?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Franklin Templeton.