PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SODJ.DE achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.81% return.


SODJ.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.91%
6M
13.29%
YTD
19.83%
1Y
38.84%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.81%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SODJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.83%11.64%13.20%15.83%-12.75%9.54%6.05%23.50%-21.34%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating)
-0.81%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%3.86%5.07%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.09

Over the past year, SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SODJ.DE
SODJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SODJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SODJ.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.06

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

0.44

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

1.13

+10.86

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SODJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SODJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SODJ.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-17.81%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-2.80%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-4.11%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-17.04%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-8.91%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-6.72%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.09%

+2.14%

Volatility

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE) at 0.94%. This indicates that SODJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SODJ.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

0.94%

+5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

2.89%

+13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

3.76%

+16.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

4.84%

+12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

4.44%

+13.78%

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SODJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SODJ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

SODJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SODJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.47%1.69%1.86%1.80%2.21%1.61%1.60%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SODJ.DE.

SODJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. SODJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Screened Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SODJ.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SODJ.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer