PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SODJ.DE having a 19.83% return and IBCG.DE slightly higher at 20.30%.


SODJ.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.91%
6M
13.29%
YTD
19.83%
1Y
38.84%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*

IBCG.DE

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.60%
6M
13.03%
YTD
20.30%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
26.62%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SODJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.83%11.64%13.20%15.83%-12.75%9.54%6.05%23.50%-21.34%
IBCG.DE
iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)
20.30%26.94%22.76%32.85%-5.89%12.06%7.58%16.67%-11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.85

The correlation between SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (5 years) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SODJ.DE
SODJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SODJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SODJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCG.DE
IBCG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IBCG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SODJ.DEIBCG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.91

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

16.44

-4.45

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SODJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the IBCG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SODJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum IBCG.DE drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SODJ.DEIBCG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-34.79%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-9.94%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-21.63%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-21.63%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-3.52%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-8.31%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.97%

+0.26%

Volatility

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SODJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) have volatilities of 6.73% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SODJ.DEIBCG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

6.82%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

16.24%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

20.47%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

18.64%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

18.39%

-0.17%

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SODJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCG.DE's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

SODJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Dividend Comparison

SODJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while IBCG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBCG.DE
iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SODJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.47%1.69%1.86%1.80%2.21%1.61%1.60%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SODJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SODJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IBCG.DE.

SODJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Screened Index, while IBCG.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SODJ.DE and 0.64% for IBCG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SODJ.DE and IBCG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer