SNXX vs. RGTU
SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.
Performance
SNXX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNXX
- 1D
- -25.16%
- 1M
- -41.21%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU
- 1D
- -14.02%
- 1M
- -49.51%
- 6M
- -79.70%
- YTD
- -73.63%
- 1Y
- -55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNXX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 539.76% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -72.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXX and RGTU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank
SNXX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RGTU
SNXX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNXX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNXX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXX drawdown since its inception was -56.01%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXX and RGTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -97.05% | +41.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.62% | -97.05% | +42.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -65.20% | +48.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 76.46% | — |
Volatility
SNXX vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXX | RGTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 46.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 139.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.36% | 218.11% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.36% | 216.19% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.36% | 216.19% | +3.17% |
SNXX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison
SNXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 78.22% | 20.63% |
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNXX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 78.22%, compared with 0.00% for SNXX.
Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SNXX and 1.30% for RGTU.
Find the right allocation for SNXX and RGTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer