SNXX vs. RGTU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SNXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.

Performance

SNXX vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNXX

• 1D: -10.88%
• 1M: -60.92%
• 6M: 102.16%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RGTU

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -36.13%
• 6M: -62.74%
• YTD: -76.61%
• 1Y: -68.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	$1.69M	$1.58M	$6.01M
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF	$1.51B	$1.59B	$1.43B

SNXX vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF	184.54%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-75.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXX and RGTU is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

SNXX vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNXX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNXX vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNXX	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.71	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.88	—

Drawdowns

SNXX vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXX drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXX and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNXX	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.09%	-97.93%	+12.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-97.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.82%	-97.39%	+17.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.82%	-66.82%	+44.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	79.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNXX	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	54.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	143.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	237.71%	213.12%	+24.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	237.71%	215.68%	+22.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	237.71%	215.68%	+22.03%

SNXX vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNXX vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

SNXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%.

Position	TTM	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	88.22%	20.63%
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNXX and RGTU in my portfolio?

SNXX and RGTU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNXX or RGTU?

On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNXX or RGTU?

RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNXX or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.00% for SNXX.

What is the main difference between SNXX and RGTU?

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SNXX and 1.30% for RGTU.