SNXX vs. LRCU
SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
SNXX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNXX
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 46.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 219.61%
- 6M
- 274.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNXX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 808.37% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 70.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXX and LRCU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNXX | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 266.61 | 12.64 | +253.97 |
Drawdowns
SNXX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXX drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXX and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXX | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.39% | -40.09% | -8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -4.57% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.51% | -9.36% | -6.15% |
Volatility
SNXX vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXX | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 194.54% | 109.40% | +85.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 194.54% | 109.40% | +85.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 194.54% | 109.40% | +85.14% |
SNXX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNXX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNXX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
SNXX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SNXX and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for SNXX and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer