PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNTH vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNTH vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.48% return.


SNTH

1D
-2.55%
1M
0.65%
YTD
7.95%
6M
6.47%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.07%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTH vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
7.95%23.89%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.48%3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and IBID is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNTH vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTH
SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTH vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNTHIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.94

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

13.33

-10.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

41.06

-30.61

SNTH vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNTHIBIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

3.92

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

2.56

-0.86

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNTHIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-1.28%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-0.36%

-8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

0.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-0.22%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

0.12%

+2.47%

Volatility

SNTH vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.30%. This indicates that SNTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNTHIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

0.30%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

0.81%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

1.24%

+11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

2.25%

+13.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

2.25%

+13.43%

SNTH vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNTH vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, more than IBID's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.66%4.43%4.24%0.81%
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
11.15%11.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNTH and IBID have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNTH has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to IBID (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 27.03% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

SNTH has the higher dividend yield at 11.15%, compared with 3.66% for IBID.

SNTH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: MRP and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNTH and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer