PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNR.L vs. IDR.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Senior PLC (SNR.L) and Indra A (IDR.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SNR.L is traded in GBp, while IDR.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IDR.MC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNR.L achieves a 48.44% return, which is significantly higher than IDR.MC's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L has underperformed IDR.MC with an annualized return of 4.99%, while IDR.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.53% annualized return.


SNR.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
48.44%
6M
53.00%
1Y
67.88%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
4.99%

IDR.MC

1D
1.58%
1M
4.17%
YTD
11.25%
6M
14.09%
1Y
61.82%
3Y*
70.07%
5Y*
52.04%
10Y*
20.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNR.L
Senior PLC
48.44%24.07%-8.71%43.23%-14.61%64.71%-43.94%-5.45%-25.63%38.12%
IDR.MC
Indra A
11.25%201.44%18.00%31.64%19.91%27.92%-27.56%16.60%-27.08%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SNR.L and IDR.MC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNR.L
SNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IDR.MC
IDR.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDR.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senior PLC (SNR.L) and Indra A (IDR.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNR.LIDR.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

2.00

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

5.06

+6.79

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the IDR.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNR.L and IDR.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNR.LIDR.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.26

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.44

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.58

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.27

-0.05

Drawdowns

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.70%, which is greater than IDR.MC's maximum drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNR.L and IDR.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNR.LIDR.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.70%

-63.75%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.16%

-30.40%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.79%

-30.40%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.71%

-30.40%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.47%

-62.76%

-22.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-16.12%

+9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-26.13%

-10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

12.10%

-6.39%

Volatility

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Senior PLC (SNR.L) is 1.32%, while Indra A (IDR.MC) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that SNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDR.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNR.LIDR.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

10.99%

-9.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.78%

39.82%

-14.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.95%

48.63%

-14.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.71%

35.47%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.63%

34.57%

+8.06%

Dividends

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Dividend Comparison

SNR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IDR.MC's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDR.MC
Indra A
0.46%0.52%1.46%1.79%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNR.L
Senior PLC
1.05%1.28%1.54%0.90%0.24%0.00%5.86%4.34%3.74%2.56%3.25%2.53%

Financials

SNR.L vs. IDR.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senior PLC and Indra A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SNR.L values in GBp, IDR.MC values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


SNR.L and IDR.MC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNR.L and IDR.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer