SNR.L vs. BA.L
SNR.L (Senior PLC) and BA.L (BAE Systems plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L returned 4.99%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for BA.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNR.L achieves a 48.44% return, which is significantly higher than BA.L's 11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SNR.L has underperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 4.99%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.37% annualized return.
SNR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 48.44%
- 6M
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 67.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.99%
BA.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 29.31%
- 5Y*
- 32.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.37%
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNR.L Senior PLC | 48.44% | 24.07% | -8.71% | 43.23% | -14.61% | 64.71% | -43.94% | -5.45% | -25.63% | 38.12% |
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 11.80% | 52.12% | 5.88% | 33.31% | 60.92% | 17.57% | -9.28% | 28.43% | -16.75% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNR.L and BA.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1989 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SNR.L and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNR.L:
£1.19B
BA.L:
£58.12B
SNR.L:
£0.13
BA.L:
£1.33
SNR.L:
21.79
BA.L:
14.45
SNR.L:
2.49
BA.L:
2.31
SNR.L:
0.70
BA.L:
1.06
SNR.L:
3.12
BA.L:
4.93
SNR.L:
£1.72B
BA.L:
£54.65B
SNR.L:
£173.70M
BA.L:
£4.75B
SNR.L:
£166.90M
BA.L:
£7.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNR.L vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SNR.L
BA.L
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Senior PLC (SNR.L) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNR.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.02 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | -0.08 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | -0.16 | +12.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNR.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -0.05 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.25 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.73 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.70%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -84.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNR.L and BA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNR.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.70% | -84.46% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -21.30% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.79% | -21.30% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.71% | -21.30% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.47% | -37.80% | -47.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -17.79% | +10.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -21.36% | -14.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 9.70% | -3.99% |
Volatility
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Senior PLC (SNR.L) is 1.32%, while BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that SNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNR.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 9.86% | -8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.78% | 23.66% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.95% | 30.05% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.71% | 25.81% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.63% | 25.07% | +17.56% |
Dividends
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison
SNR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BA.L's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 0.72% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
SNR.L Senior PLC | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.54% | 0.90% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 5.86% | 4.34% | 3.74% | 2.56% | 3.25% | 2.53% |
Financials
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Senior PLC and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNR.L vs. BA.L - Profitability Comparison
SNR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a gross profit of -28.60M and revenue of 367.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.8%.
BA.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
SNR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported an operating income of 15.30M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
BA.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
SNR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Senior PLC reported a net income of 8.40M and revenue of 367.00M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
BA.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNR.L and BA.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SNR.L and BA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer