PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500) and SBI Life Insurance Company Limited (SBILIFE.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^BSE500
S&P BSE-500
-12.30%6.41%14.55%24.85%3.34%30.11%16.80%7.75%-3.08%9.39%
SBILIFE.NS
SBI Life Insurance Company Limited
-11.89%46.63%-2.77%16.62%3.14%32.64%-5.96%61.38%-13.77%-1.72%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ^BSE500 having a -12.30% return and SBILIFE.NS slightly higher at -11.89%.


^BSE500

1D
0.08%
1M
-8.30%
YTD
-12.30%
6M
-8.82%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
12.37%

SBILIFE.NS

1D
0.74%
1M
-11.77%
YTD
-11.89%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^BSE500
^BSE500 Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
^BSE500 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^BSE500 Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
^BSE500 Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
^BSE500 Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
^BSE500 Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SBILIFE.NS
SBILIFE.NS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SBILIFE.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBILIFE.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBILIFE.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SBILIFE.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBILIFE.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500) and SBI Life Insurance Company Limited (SBILIFE.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^BSE500SBILIFE.NSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

0.82

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

1.27

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.16

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

1.03

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.73

4.39

-5.12

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^BSE500 Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the SBILIFE.NS Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^BSE500 and SBILIFE.NS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^BSE500SBILIFE.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

0.82

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.69

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.45

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ^BSE500 and SBILIFE.NS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^BSE500 drawdown since its inception was -38.39%, smaller than the maximum SBILIFE.NS drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^BSE500 and SBILIFE.NS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^BSE500SBILIFE.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.39%

-46.84%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-15.63%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-28.08%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.97%

-15.01%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-9.93%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.66%

+0.07%

Volatility

^BSE500 vs. SBILIFE.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P BSE-500 (^BSE500) is 7.95%, while SBI Life Insurance Company Limited (SBILIFE.NS) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that ^BSE500 experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBILIFE.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^BSE500SBILIFE.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

8.81%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

13.57%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

19.63%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

22.91%

-8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

26.75%

-10.62%