SNPE vs. OILK
SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNPE returned 14.46%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNPE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
SNPE vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SNPE vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.73% | 18.56% | 23.85% | 27.79% | -17.67% | 31.43% | 19.84% | 12.92% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPE and OILK is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SNPE and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SNPE vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPE
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SNPE
OILK
-
Communication Services
SNPE
OILK
-
Financial Services
SNPE
OILK
-
Healthcare
SNPE
OILK
-
Industrials
SNPE
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
SNPE
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SNPE
OILK
Energy
SNPE
OILK
-
Real Estate
SNPE
OILK
-
Basic Materials
SNPE
OILK
-
Utilities
SNPE
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPE vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
SNPE
OILK
SNPE vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 2.06 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 2.59 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.42 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | 6.91 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.06 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.59 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.12 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
SNPE vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -83.76% | +50.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -17.35% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -23.42% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -34.69% | +10.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -3.66% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -32.61% | +27.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 8.56% | -6.52% |
Volatility
SNPE vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) is 3.30%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SNPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 10.44% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 23.26% | -14.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 28.75% | -16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 30.12% | -13.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 35.97% | -16.30% |
SNPE vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNPE vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPE and OILK have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SNPE (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 14.46% for SNPE. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.91% for SNPE.
SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while OILK is Oil & Gas. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.68% for OILK.
SNPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPE and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer