PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPE vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPE vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


SNPE

1D
-1.60%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
8.65%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPE vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
8.65%18.56%23.85%5.99%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPE and IBIC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.04

The correlation between SNPE and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPE vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPE
SNPE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPE vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNPEIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.22

-0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

16.56

-13.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

58.67

-45.39

SNPE vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPE and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNPE vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPEIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-0.90%

-32.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-0.27%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.08%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-0.10%

-4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.08%

+2.00%

Volatility

SNPE vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that SNPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPEIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

0.17%

+5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

0.67%

+9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

0.89%

+11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

1.56%

+15.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

1.56%

+18.12%

SNPE vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNPE and IBIC have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNPE vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.97%1.01%1.17%1.32%1.65%1.08%1.42%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPE and IBIC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNPE has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, SNPE leads with 27.55% vs 4.42% for IBIC. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNPE has performed better with a 27.55% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPE and IBIC have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.97% for SNPE.

SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPE and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer