SNPD vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SNPD returned 13.67% vs 223.67% for CHPS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

SNPD vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

SNPD

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 8.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.10%	6.66%	5.41%	1.27%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and CHPS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.37

SNPD vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPD	CHPS
Consumer Defensive	18.7%	-
Industrials	17.5%	0.4%
Utilities	14.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Financial Services	8.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	7.1%	-
Real Estate	6.8%	-
Technology	6.3%	98.8%
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Energy	3.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 33
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPD	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	6.54	-5.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	6.07	-4.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.81	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	12.87	-11.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	49.99	-45.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPD vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPD	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	6.54	-5.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.81	-1.24

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-39.44%	+23.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-17.50%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	0.00%	-3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-9.16%	+5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	4.50%	-1.60%

Volatility

SNPD vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 2.75%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	14.18%	-11.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	28.19%	-20.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	34.43%	-23.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	33.78%	-20.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	33.78%	-20.64%

SNPD vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNPD and CHPS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPD vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.01%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and CHPS in my portfolio?

SNPD and CHPS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 13.67% for SNPD. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or CHPS?

SNPD and CHPS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or CHPS?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between SNPD and CHPS?

SNPD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.