SNOW vs. RGTI
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) and RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SNOW in Software - Application, RGTI in Computer Hardware. Over the past 5 years, SNOW returned -0.66%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNOW vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -5.28% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 54.40%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.66%
- 10Y*
- —
RGTI
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 17.54%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- 84.04%
- 3Y*
- 152.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 6.12% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 46.40% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -5.28% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and RGTI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
SNOW:
$80.40B
RGTI:
$7.04B
SNOW:
-$3.53
RGTI:
-$0.71
SNOW:
15.70
RGTI:
664.25
SNOW:
39.02
RGTI:
12.06
SNOW:
$5.03B
RGTI:
$10.02M
SNOW:
$3.38B
RGTI:
$3.00M
SNOW:
-$1.21B
RGTI:
-$263.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
RGTI
SNOW vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOW | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.96 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 1.47 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -96.89% | +23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -77.10% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -78.83% | +22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | -96.89% | +23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.08% | -62.76% | +20.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.02% | -58.84% | +9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 49.98% | -24.05% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) is 35.77%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.79%. This indicates that SNOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.77% | 44.79% | -9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.64% | 71.15% | -18.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.34% | 109.21% | -43.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.88% | 128.97% | -67.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.68% | 127.17% | -64.49% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNOW nor RGTI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SNOW vs. RGTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Rigetti Computing Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and RGTI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to SNOW (35.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs RGTI's -96.89%.
RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer