SNOW vs. FRHC
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) and FRHC (Freedom Holding Corp.) are both stocks. SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FRHC operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, SNOW returned -0.66%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for FRHC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNOW vs. FRHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than FRHC's 13.58% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 52.77%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.66%
- 10Y*
- —
FRHC
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- -9.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW vs. FRHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 6.12% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
FRHC Freedom Holding Corp. | 13.58% | -6.89% | 62.15% | 38.44% | -16.02% | 35.12% | 116.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and FRHC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SNOW and FRHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNOW:
-$3.53
FRHC:
$0.04
SNOW:
15.70
FRHC:
3.99
SNOW:
$5.03B
FRHC:
$2.12B
SNOW:
$3.38B
FRHC:
$1.05B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
FRHC:
$542.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. FRHC — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
FRHC
SNOW vs. FRHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOW | FRHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.99 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.23 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | -0.40 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. FRHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, which is greater than FRHC's maximum drawdown of -45.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and FRHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | FRHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -45.93% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -41.08% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -41.08% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | -45.93% | -27.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.08% | -27.32% | -14.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.02% | -11.70% | -37.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 23.29% | +2.64% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. FRHC - Volatility Comparison
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 35.77% compared to Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) at 13.08%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | FRHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.77% | 13.08% | +22.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.64% | 28.16% | +24.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.34% | 38.90% | +26.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.88% | 37.95% | +23.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.68% | 47.72% | +14.96% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. FRHC - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNOW nor FRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SNOW vs. FRHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Freedom Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNOW vs. FRHC - Profitability Comparison
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
FRHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 354.51M and revenue of 615.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
FRHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 199.99M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
FRHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a net income of 76.24M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and FRHC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (35.77%) compared to FRHC (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs FRHC's -45.93%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and FRHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer