SNOV vs. PQAP

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

SNOV (FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOV returned 16.73% vs 18.59% for PQAP. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNOV charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

SNOV vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOV achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 11.58% return.

SNOV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 9.65%
• YTD: 9.65%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 11.58%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 1Y: 18.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOV vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November	9.65%	7.01%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	11.58%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOV and PQAP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.69

The correlation between SNOV and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SNOV vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOV

SNOV Risk / Return Rank: 55
SNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOV vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOV	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	3.76	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	5.85	-3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.89	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	8.70	-6.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	48.90	-39.74

SNOV vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOV and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOV vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.36%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOV and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOV	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.36%	-10.79%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-2.15%	-5.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.58%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-0.62%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	0.38%	+1.45%

Volatility

SNOV vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is 1.88%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that SNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOV	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	2.73%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.03%	4.06%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	4.98%	+5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.03%	10.96%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.03%	10.96%	+0.07%

SNOV vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOV vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

SNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
SNOV FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOV and PQAP in my portfolio?

SNOV and PQAP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOV or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to SNOV (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOV dropped -15.36% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, SNOV or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 18.59% vs 16.73% for SNOV. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOV or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 18.59% return vs 16.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOV or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOV or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SNOV.

What is the main difference between SNOV and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SNOV and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.