PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOU vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -3.24% return.


SNOU

1D
3.04%
1M
163.04%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
-21.80%
1Y
-15.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
2.59%
1M
-16.87%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
-65.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and TSLZ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOU
SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOUTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.89

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.86

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

-1.08

+0.73

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOUTSLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.72

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

-0.67

+0.96

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOUTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.17%

-99.11%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.17%

-76.62%

-7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.39%

-98.98%

+53.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-75.39%

+42.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.23%

60.77%

-15.54%

Volatility

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 67.00% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.24%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOUTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

67.00%

24.24%

+42.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.21%

55.00%

+51.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.55%

91.68%

+39.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.12%

116.96%

+12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.12%

116.96%

+12.16%

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than TSLZ's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SNOU
T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
6.45%5.97%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.71%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOU has higher volatility (67.00%) compared to TSLZ (24.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, SNOU leads with -15.82% vs -65.66% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNOU has performed better with a -15.82% return vs -65.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.

SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.71% for TSLZ.

SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 1.05% for TSLZ.

SNOU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOU and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer