SNOU vs. TSLZ
SNOU (T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOU returned -15.82% vs -65.66% for TSLZ. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. SNOU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -3.24% return.
SNOU
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 163.04%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 6M
- -21.80%
- 1Y
- -15.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.97%
- 1Y
- -65.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | -7.36% | 52.64% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -3.24% | -80.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOU and TSLZ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SNOU
TSLZ
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.89 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.86 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | -1.08 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | -0.72 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.67 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.17% | -99.11% | +14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.17% | -76.62% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.39% | -98.98% | +53.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -75.39% | +42.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.23% | 60.77% | -15.54% |
Volatility
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 67.00% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.24%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 67.00% | 24.24% | +42.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.21% | 55.00% | +51.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.55% | 91.68% | +39.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 129.12% | 116.96% | +12.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 129.12% | 116.96% | +12.16% |
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than TSLZ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | 6.45% | 5.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOU has higher volatility (67.00%) compared to TSLZ (24.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, SNOU leads with -15.82% vs -65.66% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SNOU has performed better with a -15.82% return vs -65.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.
SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.71% for TSLZ.
SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 1.05% for TSLZ.
SNOU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer