SNOU vs. MUU
SNOU (T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNOU is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. SNOU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SNOU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNOU
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- 53.34%
- YTD
- -21.84%
- 6M
- -24.41%
- 1Y
- -36.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | -12.46% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOU and MUU is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SNOU
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SNOU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.17% | -26.63% | -57.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.93% | -26.63% | -27.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -12.91% | -20.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.62% | — | — |
Volatility
SNOU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 103.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.37% | 263.57% | -131.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.96% | 263.57% | -136.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.96% | 263.57% | -136.61% |
SNOU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.23% | 0.00% |
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF | 7.64% | 5.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOU and MUU have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.
SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for SNOU and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer