SNOU vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SNOU (T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. SNOU is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOU returned -36.88% vs 1296.25% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SNOU charges 1.50%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

SNOU vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a -21.84% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 769.73% return.

SNOU

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: 53.34%
• YTD: -21.84%
• 6M: -24.41%
• 1Y: -36.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -18.59%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 769.73%
• 6M: 723.00%
• 1Y: 1,296.25%
• 3Y*: 109.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOU vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF	-21.84%	63.07%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	769.73%	67.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and BWET is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

SNOU vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOU

SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 8
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOU vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOU	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	13.17	-13.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	5.71	-5.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.83	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	42.79	-43.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	136.82	-137.61

SNOU vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 13.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOU	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.17%	-56.90%	-27.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.17%	-30.64%	-53.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.93%	-23.05%	-30.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.16%	-23.76%	-9.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.62%	9.87%	+36.75%

Volatility

SNOU vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 66.50% compared to Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) at 32.83%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOU	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	66.50%	32.83%	+33.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.28%	91.75%	+11.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.37%	100.33%	+32.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.96%	71.24%	+55.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.96%	71.24%	+55.72%

SNOU vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOU vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SNOU T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF	7.64%	5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOU and BWET in my portfolio?

SNOU and BWET have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOU or BWET?

SNOU has higher volatility (66.50%) compared to BWET (32.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, SNOU or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1296.25% vs -36.88% for SNOU. On fees, SNOU is cheaper at 1.50% per year. On volatility, BWET has been the lower-risk option at 32.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOU or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1296.25% return vs -36.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOU or BWET?

SNOU is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOU or BWET?

SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between SNOU and BWET?

SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.17 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.