PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOU vs. AAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOU vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a -10.09% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 21.23% return.


SNOU

1D
-14.91%
1M
148.51%
YTD
-10.09%
6M
-41.19%
1Y
-18.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPX

1D
-3.52%
1M
24.03%
YTD
21.23%
6M
8.76%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOU vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and AAPX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOU vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOU
SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOU vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOUAAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

3.26

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

7.75

-8.15

SNOU vs. AAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the AAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and AAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOUAAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.19

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.52

-0.26

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and AAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOUAAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.17%

-58.55%

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.17%

-30.12%

-54.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.00%

-3.52%

-43.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.45%

-19.36%

-13.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.13%

12.66%

+32.47%

Volatility

SNOU vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 67.38% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) at 11.21%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOUAAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

67.38%

11.21%

+56.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.45%

32.05%

+74.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.53%

44.99%

+86.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.34%

54.62%

+74.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.34%

54.62%

+74.72%

SNOU vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOU vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than AAPX's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.55%0.67%21.46%
SNOU
T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
6.64%5.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOU and AAPX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOU has higher volatility (67.38%) compared to AAPX (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs AAPX's -58.55%.

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 97.74% vs -18.14% for SNOU. On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 97.74% return vs -18.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.

SNOU has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.55% for AAPX.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 1.05% for AAPX.

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOU and AAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer