PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOIX vs. HHCZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) and NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOIX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than HHCZX's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SNOIX has outperformed HHCZX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while HHCZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.67% annualized return.


SNOIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
9.17%
6M
11.32%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
10.21%

HHCZX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-7.10%
1Y
1.09%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*
3.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNOIX
Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund
9.17%20.66%5.17%10.84%-3.10%26.26%1.44%22.44%-11.25%12.80%
HHCZX
NexPoint Event Driven Fund
-4.23%6.52%7.22%5.44%-5.49%-17.31%22.24%11.36%12.72%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOIX and HHCZX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2008

0.44

The correlation between SNOIX and HHCZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOIX vs. HHCZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOIX
SNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HHCZX
HHCZX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HHCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HHCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) and NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOIXHHCZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

0.06

+2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

0.26

+3.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.03

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.21

0.06

+6.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.72

0.12

+20.61

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the HHCZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOIX and HHCZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOIXHHCZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.06

+2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

-0.23

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.23

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.28

+0.04

Drawdowns

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOIX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than HHCZX's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOIX and HHCZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOIXHHCZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-33.57%

-31.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.50%

-15.42%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-15.42%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.66%

-30.02%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.43%

-32.15%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-15.96%

+15.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-14.01%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

7.84%

-6.49%

Volatility

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Volatility Comparison

Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) at 2.33%. This indicates that SNOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HHCZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOIXHHCZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.33%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

8.09%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

16.33%

-4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

10.68%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.27%

+0.25%

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOIX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than HHCZX's 1.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOIX vs. HHCZX - Dividend Comparison

SNOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, while HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHCZX
NexPoint Event Driven Fund
0.00%0.00%0.56%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.06%0.00%4.27%
SNOIX
Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund
6.33%6.91%5.10%2.29%7.07%8.98%1.86%1.95%2.06%4.80%0.36%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOIX and HHCZX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to HHCZX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOIX dropped -65.34% vs HHCZX's -33.57%.

SNOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOIX and HHCZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer