SNLN vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNLN (Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SNLN tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNLN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

SNLN vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNLN vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.79%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SNLN and SCYB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.01

SNLN vs. SCYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNLN	SCYB
Industrials	100.0%	8.7%
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Communication Services	-	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	5.8%
Financial Services	-	4.9%
Healthcare	-	5.8%
Real Estate	-	4.2%
Technology	-	4.5%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

SNLN vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNLN vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.68	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.92%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.33%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.52%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.76%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	5.13%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	5.13%	—

SNLN vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNLN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNLN vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

SNLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.94%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.50%	4.88%	2.83%	3.21%	4.72%	5.03%	4.75%	4.36%	4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNLN and SCYB in my portfolio?

SNLN and SCYB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNLN or SCYB?

On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNLN or SCYB?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SNLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNLN or SCYB?

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 0.00% for SNLN.

What is the main difference between SNLN and SCYB?

SNLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Highland Capital Management and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNLN and 0.03% for SCYB.