SNLN vs. SCYB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB).

SNLN and SCYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SNLN is a passively managed fund by Highland Capital Management that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2012. SCYB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023. Both SNLN and SCYB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SNLN vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SNLN vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.79%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	-0.47%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%

Returns By Period

SNLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 6.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNLN vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNLN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

SNLN

Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF

SCYB

Schwab High Yield Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SNLN vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 74
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNLN vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.62	—

Correlation

The correlation between SNLN and SCYB is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SNLN vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

SNLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.50%	4.88%	2.83%	3.21%	4.72%	5.03%	4.75%	4.36%	4.36%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	7.01%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.92%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.50%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.53%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNLN	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.67%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	5.20%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	5.20%	—