PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNLAY vs. 0083.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sino Land Co Ltd ADR (SNLAY) and Sino Land (0083.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SNLAY is traded in USD, while 0083.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0083.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNLAY achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than 0083.HK's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SNLAY has underperformed 0083.HK with an annualized return of 3.13%, while 0083.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 3.45% annualized return.


SNLAY

1D
2.84%
1M
-8.04%
6M
-12.48%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
3.13%
ALL TIME*
3.52%

0083.HK

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.67%
6M
-5.21%
YTD
4.79%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
3.45%
ALL TIME*
3.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

0083.HK

Sino Land
$7.63M$7.53M$12.90M
$7.46K$21.00K$38.15K

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNLAY
Sino Land Co Ltd ADR
9.22%30.34%-2.40%-7.52%4.94%-0.14%0.50%-10.52%4.15%24.02%
0083.HK
Sino Land
4.79%38.31%-0.21%-7.02%6.72%3.36%-3.61%-11.47%3.04%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SNLAY and 0083.HK is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNLAY
SNLAY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SNLAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNLAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNLAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SNLAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNLAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

0083.HK
0083.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
0083.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0083.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
0083.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
0083.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
0083.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sino Land Co Ltd ADR (SNLAY) and Sino Land (0083.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNLAY0083.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.13

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

2.79

-1.37

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNLAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the 0083.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNLAY and 0083.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNLAY drawdown since its inception was -82.03%, roughly equal to the maximum 0083.HK drawdown of -81.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNLAY and 0083.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNLAY0083.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.03%

-81.97%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.85%

-22.57%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-22.57%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-29.17%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.12%

-43.07%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.66%

-19.11%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.49%

-30.09%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

9.04%

+1.77%

Volatility

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Volatility Comparison

Sino Land Co Ltd ADR (SNLAY) has a higher volatility of 35.95% compared to Sino Land (0083.HK) at 5.19%. This indicates that SNLAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0083.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNLAY0083.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.95%

5.19%

+30.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.56%

17.98%

+41.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.05%

22.85%

+54.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.84%

22.66%

+29.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.29%

24.06%

+18.23%

Dividends

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Dividend Comparison

SNLAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than 0083.HK's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0083.HK
Sino Land
5.45%5.68%7.39%6.83%5.84%8.55%5.47%4.86%6.33%3.83%4.39%4.40%
SNLAY
Sino Land Co Ltd ADR
5.71%6.16%7.55%6.81%5.81%8.41%5.00%4.43%7.21%4.60%8.45%3.99%

Financials

SNLAY vs. 0083.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sino Land Co Ltd ADR and Sino Land. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SNLAY values in USD, 0083.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


SNLAY and 0083.HK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNLAY and 0083.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer