0083.HK vs. 0016.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

0083.HK (Sino Land) and 0016.HK (Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Development industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, 0083.HK returned 5.25%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for 0016.HK. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Sino Land (0083.HK) and Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited (0016.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0083.HK achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly lower than 0016.HK's 31.55% return. Over the past 10 years, 0083.HK has underperformed 0016.HK with an annualized return of 5.25%, while 0016.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 7.59% annualized return.

0083.HK

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -11.32%
• YTD: 15.67%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 53.31%
• 3Y*: 11.22%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 5.25%

0016.HK

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -15.39%
• YTD: 31.55%
• 6M: 26.34%
• 1Y: 51.42%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: 6.00%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0083.HK Sino Land	15.67%	38.55%	-0.72%	-7.04%	6.90%	1.15%	-5.52%	-11.93%	3.29%	23.79%
0016.HK Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited	31.55%	32.23%	-7.41%	-16.37%	19.48%	-0.86%	-12.07%	11.36%	-10.71%	37.54%

Correlation

The correlation between 0083.HK and 0016.HK is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1999	0.62

The correlation between 0083.HK and 0016.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0083.HK

0083.HK Risk / Return Rank: 90
0083.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
0083.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
0083.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 90
0083.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
0083.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

0016.HK

0016.HK Risk / Return Rank: 85
0016.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
0016.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
0016.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 81
0016.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
0016.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sino Land (0083.HK) and Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited (0016.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0083.HK	0016.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.84	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.57	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	3.55	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	10.94	+0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0083.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the 0016.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0083.HK and 0016.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0083.HK	0016.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.84	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.25	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.33	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.20	+0.04

Drawdowns

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0083.HK drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, which is greater than 0016.HK's maximum drawdown of -70.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0083.HK and 0016.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0083.HK	0016.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.11%	-70.45%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.51%	-15.39%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.18%	-32.49%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.38%	-38.73%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.56%	-40.38%	-4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.32%	-15.39%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.73%	-21.45%	-10.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	4.93%	+0.13%

Volatility

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sino Land (0083.HK) is 5.78%, while Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited (0016.HK) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that 0083.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0016.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0083.HK	0016.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	9.70%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.79%	23.76%	-5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	29.80%	-7.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.05%	24.24%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.10%	23.36%	+0.74%

Dividends

0083.HK vs. 0016.HK - Dividend Comparison

0083.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than 0016.HK's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0016.HK Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited	3.06%	3.96%	5.02%	5.86%	4.63%	5.23%	4.95%	4.15%	4.17%	3.14%	3.93%	3.58%
0083.HK Sino Land	4.97%	5.68%	7.39%	6.83%	5.84%	5.66%	5.45%	4.86%	6.33%	3.83%	4.39%	4.40%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0083.HK and 0016.HK in my portfolio?

0083.HK and 0016.HK have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.