PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDL vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNDL vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDL achieves a -25.90% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's -4.31% return.


SNDL

1D
-1.60%
1M
-10.55%
6M
-20.13%
YTD
-25.90%
1Y
-25.45%
3Y*
-8.30%
5Y*
-31.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-48.63%

NIO

1D
0.83%
1M
1.88%
6M
3.83%
YTD
-4.31%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
-35.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$108.54M$112.03M$170.52M
$2.52M$2.41M$2.77M

SNDL vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-25.90%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%-84.27%-76.88%
NIO
NIO Inc.
-4.31%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDL and NIO is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.31

The correlation between SNDL and NIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNDL:

$320.17M

NIO:

$12.11B

EPS

SNDL:

-CA$0.08

NIO:

-CN¥3.65

PS Ratio

SNDL:

0.48

NIO:

0.81

PB Ratio

SNDL:

0.42

NIO:

18.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$928.39M

NIO:

CN¥100.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$243.57M

NIO:

CN¥15.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$37.40M

NIO:

-CN¥7.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDL vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNDL vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNDLNIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.05

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

0.00

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

0.01

-0.72

SNDL vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDL and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNDL vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDL drawdown since its inception was -99.08%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDL and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDLNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.08%

-95.00%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.37%

-43.73%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.37%

-78.81%

+21.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.96%

-93.11%

+6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.06%

-92.23%

-6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.51%

-68.31%

-26.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.15%

28.31%

+11.84%

Volatility

SNDL vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to NIO Inc. (NIO) at 10.44%. This indicates that SNDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDLNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

10.44%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.46%

39.90%

-7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.86%

60.88%

+5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.17%

71.11%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.04%

86.06%

+27.98%

Dividends

SNDL vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDL nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SNDL vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sundial Growers Inc. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SNDL vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sundial Growers Inc. and NIO Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SNDL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported a gross profit of 56.35M and revenue of 235.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

NIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

SNDL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported an operating income of -5.45M and revenue of 235.77M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.3%.

NIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

SNDL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported a net income of -7.82M and revenue of 235.77M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.

NIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNDL and NIO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDL has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to NIO (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDL dropped -99.08% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDL and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer