PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDL vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNDL vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDL achieves a -13.25% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 17.84% return.


SNDL

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.13%
YTD
-13.25%
6M
-15.29%
1Y
13.39%
3Y*
-0.91%
5Y*
-35.50%
10Y*

NIO

1D
0.50%
1M
1.69%
YTD
17.84%
6M
19.48%
1Y
70.74%
3Y*
-7.36%
5Y*
-31.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDL vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-13.25%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%-84.27%-64.50%
NIO
NIO Inc.
17.84%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%22.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDL and NIO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.31

The correlation between SNDL and NIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNDL:

$376.27M

NIO:

$14.91B

EPS

SNDL:

-$0.04

NIO:

-$3.74

PS Ratio

SNDL:

0.40

NIO:

0.14

PB Ratio

SNDL:

0.35

NIO:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNDL:

$940.66M

NIO:

$100.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNDL:

$242.63M

NIO:

$15.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNDL:

$43.64M

NIO:

-$7.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDL vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDL vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNDLNIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.13

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

1.90

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

1.60

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.39

2.89

-2.49

SNDL vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDL and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNDLNIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.13

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

-0.45

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

-0.01

-0.38

Drawdowns

SNDL vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDL drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDL and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDLNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-95.00%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.17%

-43.73%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.34%

-79.69%

+25.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.57%

-94.10%

+4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.89%

-90.44%

-8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.42%

-67.84%

-26.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.26%

24.19%

+10.07%

Volatility

SNDL vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) is 8.37%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 18.54%. This indicates that SNDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDLNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

18.54%

-10.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.83%

41.30%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.50%

62.81%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.37%

71.65%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.47%

86.73%

+27.74%

Dividends

SNDL vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDL nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SNDL vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sundial Growers Inc. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
199.17M
25.53B
(SNDL) Total Revenue
(NIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNDL vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sundial Growers Inc. and NIO Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
20.4%
19.0%
Portfolio components
SNDL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.62M and revenue of 199.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

NIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

SNDL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported an operating income of -11.47M and revenue of 199.17M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.8%.

NIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

SNDL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sundial Growers Inc. reported a net income of -10.08M and revenue of 199.17M, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.

NIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNDL and NIO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIO has higher volatility (18.54%) compared to SNDL (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDL dropped -99.07% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDL and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer