PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDL vs. CGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNDL vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDL achieves a -13.86% return, which is significantly higher than CGC's -17.00% return.


SNDL

1D
2.14%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-13.86%
6M
-19.66%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
-32.23%
10Y*

CGC

1D
-1.14%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-17.00%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
-20.49%
3Y*
-43.24%
5Y*
-67.15%
10Y*
-26.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDL vs. CGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-13.86%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%-84.27%-76.88%
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
-17.00%-58.39%-46.38%-77.88%-73.54%-64.57%16.83%-35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDL and CGC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.59

The correlation between SNDL and CGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNDL:

$373.66M

CGC:

$364.28M

EPS

SNDL:

-CA$0.04

CGC:

-CA$1.23

PS Ratio

SNDL:

0.56

CGC:

1.28

PB Ratio

SNDL:

0.49

CGC:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$940.66M

CGC:

CA$312.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$242.63M

CGC:

CA$77.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

SNDL:

CA$43.64M

CGC:

-CA$205.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDL vs. CGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CGC
CGC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDL vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNDLCGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.37

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.58

+1.00

SNDL vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDL and CGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNDL vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDL drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDL and CGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDLCGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-99.85%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.17%

-55.38%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.34%

-95.10%

+40.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.64%

-99.67%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.90%

-99.83%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-62.22%

-32.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.12%

35.51%

+0.61%

Volatility

SNDL vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) is 6.79%, while Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that SNDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDLCGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

8.31%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.86%

46.40%

-15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.30%

103.10%

-34.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.32%

124.27%

-53.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.76%

103.39%

+11.37%

Dividends

SNDL vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDL nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SNDL vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sundial Growers Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
199.17M
71.25M
(SNDL) Total Revenue
(CGC) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SNDL and CGC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGC has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to SNDL (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDL dropped -99.07% vs CGC's -99.85%.

SNDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDL and CGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer