SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE
SNAZ.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and SXRV.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SNAZ.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while SXRV.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNAZ.DE returned -0.08%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for SXRV.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAZ.DE charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SXRV.DE.
Performance
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAZ.DE achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SXRV.DE's 19.60% return.
SNAZ.DE
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SXRV.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAZ.DE iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.98% | 6.26% | 4.36% | 5.28% | -14.17% | -1.55% | 5.52% |
SXRV.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.60% | 6.98% | 33.55% | 51.19% | -30.05% | 39.34% | 40.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAZ.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNAZ.DE
SXRV.DE
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAZ.DE | SXRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.34 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 9.73 | -4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum SXRV.DE drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAZ.DE and SXRV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAZ.DE | SXRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -32.80% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -10.03% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -26.69% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -31.33% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.09% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -6.48% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 3.45% | -2.66% |
Volatility
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) is 0.91%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that SNAZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAZ.DE | SXRV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 6.67% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 12.11% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 16.67% | -13.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 19.97% | -14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 19.69% | -12.04% |
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAZ.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAZ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAZ.DE nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAZ.DE and SXRV.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRV.DE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SNAZ.DE.
SNAZ.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. SNAZ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SNAZ.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNAZ.DE and SXRV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer