PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAZ.DE achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than IS02.DE's 5.08% return.


SNAZ.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
0.39%
6M
0.98%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

IS02.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.16%
6M
5.03%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNAZ.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.98%6.26%4.36%5.28%-14.17%-1.55%2.79%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
5.08%1.10%11.83%6.71%-13.12%5.72%-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and IS02.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2020

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAZ.DE
SNAZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IS02.DE
IS02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAZ.DEIS02.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

4.14

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

12.25

-7.11

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAZ.DE and IS02.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than IS02.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAZ.DE and IS02.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAZ.DEIS02.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-16.21%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-3.00%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-12.85%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-16.21%

-5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.84%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.85%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.01%

-0.22%

Volatility

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) is 0.91%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that SNAZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS02.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAZ.DEIS02.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.66%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

4.18%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

6.14%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

8.54%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

8.37%

-0.72%

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAZ.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than IS02.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAZ.DE vs. IS02.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAZ.DE nor IS02.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAZ.DE and IS02.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS02.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS02.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SNAZ.DE.

SNAZ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SNAZ.DE and 0.45% for IS02.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAZ.DE and IS02.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer