PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAP vs. PANW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNAP vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAP achieves a -41.88% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 80.15% return.


SNAP

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-32.32%
YTD
-41.88%
1Y
-50.27%
3Y*
-25.36%
5Y*
-42.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.92%

PANW

1D
1.89%
1M
-5.74%
6M
87.51%
YTD
80.15%
1Y
91.15%
3Y*
37.88%
5Y*
37.91%
10Y*
31.54%
ALL TIME*
29.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.96B$2.24B$2.30B
$138.05M$148.62M$216.62M

SNAP vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNAP
Snap Inc.
-41.88%-25.07%-36.39%89.16%-80.97%-6.07%206.61%196.37%-62.29%-39.12%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
80.15%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAP and PANW is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNAP:

$7.94B

PANW:

$270.44B

EPS

SNAP:

-$0.24

PANW:

$1.17

PS Ratio

SNAP:

1.31

PANW:

22.59

PB Ratio

SNAP:

3.80

PANW:

8.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNAP:

$6.10B

PANW:

$10.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNAP:

$3.40B

PANW:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNAP:

-$173.71M

PANW:

$1.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAP vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNAP
SNAP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SNAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNAP vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAPPANWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.36

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.55

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

5.95

-7.39

SNAP vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAP Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAP and PANW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAP vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and PANW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAPPANWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.27%

-47.98%

-47.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.50%

-36.01%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.48%

-36.01%

-41.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.27%

-36.01%

-59.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.36%

-7.49%

-86.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.52%

-14.59%

-45.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.93%

15.38%

+19.55%

Volatility

SNAP vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap Inc. (SNAP) is 9.44%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that SNAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAPPANWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

14.66%

-5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.50%

35.66%

+7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.15%

41.04%

+15.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.44%

42.40%

+33.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.53%

38.91%

+32.62%

Dividends

SNAP vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAP nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SNAP vs. PANW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SNAP vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Snap Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SNAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.55M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

SNAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap Inc. reported an operating income of -74.45M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.9%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

SNAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snap Inc. reported a net income of -88.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNAP and PANW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to SNAP (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs PANW's -47.98%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAP and PANW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer