SNAP vs. CRWD
SNAP (Snap Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. SNAP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SNAP returned -38.02%/yr vs 25.22%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNAP vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAP achieves a -29.99% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 40.54% return.
SNAP
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -29.99%
- 6M
- -29.64%
- 1Y
- -31.68%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -38.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 40.64%
- 3Y*
- 63.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAP vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP Snap Inc. | -29.99% | -25.07% | -36.39% | 89.16% | -80.97% | -6.07% | 206.61% | 18.76% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 40.54% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAP and CRWD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.39 |
The correlation between SNAP and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNAP:
$9.54B
CRWD:
$169.89B
SNAP:
-$0.24
CRWD:
-$0.02
SNAP:
1.57
CRWD:
32.89
SNAP:
4.57
CRWD:
36.66
SNAP:
$6.10B
CRWD:
$5.09B
SNAP:
$3.40B
CRWD:
$3.82B
SNAP:
-$173.71M
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAP vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
SNAP
CRWD
SNAP vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAP | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.10 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 2.52 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAP | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.91 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.50 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.75 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
SNAP vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAP | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.27% | -67.69% | -27.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.03% | -37.18% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.48% | -44.44% | -33.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.27% | -67.69% | -27.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.20% | -15.77% | -77.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.01% | -23.64% | -36.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.93% | 16.18% | +17.75% |
Volatility
SNAP vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap Inc. (SNAP) is 13.84%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 17.60%. This indicates that SNAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAP | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.84% | 17.60% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.11% | 37.02% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.46% | 45.06% | +10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.99% | 50.79% | +25.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.79% | 55.99% | +15.80% |
Dividends
SNAP vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAP nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SNAP vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNAP vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
SNAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.55M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
SNAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported an operating income of -74.45M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.9%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
SNAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a net income of -88.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAP and CRWD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to SNAP (13.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNAP and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer