SNAG vs. XTJL
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNAG is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
SNAG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -74.12% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.36% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- 6M
- -74.71%
- YTD
- -74.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 14.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.12% | 9.86% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.36% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and XTJL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
SNAG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -23.24% | -58.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.06% | 0.00% | -78.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -3.96% | -53.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.09% | 7.36% | +112.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 15.09% | +105.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 15.07% | +105.02% |
SNAG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
SNAG and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer