PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return.


SNAG

1D
10.73%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-54.52%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNAG
Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF
-54.52%11.30%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAG and TQQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAG

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

0.74

-1.39

Drawdowns

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.94%

-81.66%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.45%

-2.29%

-59.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.49%

-18.52%

-35.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

Volatility

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.01%

47.60%

+71.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.01%

66.50%

+52.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.01%

65.95%

+53.06%

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNAG
Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.

SNAG tracks Snap Inc. (SNAP), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer