SNAG vs. TQQQ
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SNAG tracks the Snap Inc. (SNAP) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -74.12% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 46.69% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- 6M
- -74.71%
- YTD
- -74.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 38.69%
- YTD
- 46.69%
- 1Y
- 85.21%
- 3Y*
- 57.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 43.22%
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.12% | 9.86% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 46.69% | 6.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and TQQQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -81.66% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.06% | -11.48% | -66.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -18.48% | -39.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.09% | 54.89% | +65.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 67.67% | +52.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 66.35% | +53.74% |
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.49% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.
SNAG tracks Snap Inc. (SNAP), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.95% for TQQQ.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer