SNAG vs. RTXG
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. SNAG is passively managed, while RTXG is actively managed. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
SNAG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -74.30% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's 24.96% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -64.14%
- YTD
- -74.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RTXG
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 1Y
- 63.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 83.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $945.29K | $642.88K | $633.54K | |
| $221.93K | $169.86K | $336.10K |
SNAG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.30% | 9.86% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 24.96% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and RTXG is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RTXG
SNAG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAG | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and RTXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -37.49% | -44.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.21% | -4.48% | -73.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.79% | -10.35% | -49.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.21% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.18% | 51.89% | +64.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.18% | 51.21% | +64.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.18% | 51.21% | +64.97% |
SNAG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SNAG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
SNAG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison
SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 5.09% | 6.36% |
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and RTXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer