PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's -10.32% return.


SNAG

1D
10.73%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-54.52%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
7.53%
1M
7.34%
YTD
-10.32%
6M
2.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNAG and RTXG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SNAG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAGRTXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

0.92

-1.57

Drawdowns

SNAG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.94%

-37.49%

-44.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.45%

-31.45%

-30.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.49%

-8.76%

-45.73%

Volatility

SNAG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.01%

49.13%

+69.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.01%

49.13%

+69.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.01%

49.13%

+69.88%

SNAG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNAG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SNAG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNAG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNAG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer