SNAG vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNAG is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

SNAG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -54.52% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 774.91% return.

SNAG

• 1D: 10.73%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -54.52%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -15.62%
• 1M: 119.20%
• YTD: 774.91%
• 6M: 1,229.17%
• 1Y: 5,016.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF	-54.52%	11.30%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	774.91%	29.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAG and MULL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

SNAG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNAG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	38.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	6.53	-7.19

Drawdowns

SNAG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.94%	-72.29%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.45%	-15.62%	-45.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.49%	-20.61%	-33.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNAG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	57.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	107.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.01%	133.41%	-14.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.01%	136.72%	-17.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.01%	136.72%	-17.71%

SNAG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

SNAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAG and MULL in my portfolio?

SNAG and MULL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNAG or MULL?

On fees, SNAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAG or MULL?

SNAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAG or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for SNAG.

What is the main difference between SNAG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 1.50% for MULL.