SNAG vs. IFED
SNAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SNAG tracks the Snap Inc. (SNAP) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
SNAG vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAG achieves a -74.12% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.41% return.
SNAG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -23.68%
- 6M
- -74.71%
- YTD
- -74.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAG vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNAG Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF | -74.12% | 9.86% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.41% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAG and IFED is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAG vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
SNAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IFED
SNAG vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF (SNAG) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAG vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAG drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAG and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.94% | -22.36% | -59.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.06% | -5.39% | -72.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -5.83% | -51.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.00% | — |
Volatility
SNAG vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.09% | 17.83% | +102.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 20.03% | +100.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.09% | 20.03% | +100.06% |
SNAG vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAG vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAG nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAG and IFED have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SNAG.
SNAG and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SNAG tracks Snap Inc. (SNAP), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNAG and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for SNAG and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer