PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNA2.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) and VUDP.F (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing) are both Government Bonds funds - SNA2.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Core Bond while VUDP.F tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNA2.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VUDP.F.

Performance

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNA2.DE achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than VUDP.F's -1.75% return.

SNA2.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.93%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.09%
1Y
1.39%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
—

VUDP.F

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
-1.80%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist		0.82%-1.66%
VUDP.F
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing		-1.75%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SNA2.DE and VUDP.F is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist

Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing

Often compared with SNA2.DE:
SNA2.DE vs. SHYSNA2.DE vs. 2B7S.DESNA2.DE vs. PRAS.DESNA2.DE vs. SXRM.DESNA2.DE vs. PR1T.DESNA2.DE vs. PR1S.DESNA2.DE vs. TRD7.DE
Often compared with VUDP.F:
VUDP.F vs. VAGF.DEVUDP.F vs. VX6F.DEVUDP.F vs. SXRL.DEVUDP.F vs. CEMF.DEVUDP.F vs. VFEA.DEVUDP.F vs. 2B7S.DEVUDP.F vs. V3AA.DE

Return for Risk

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SNA2.DE
SNA2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SNA2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNA2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
VUDP.F
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SNA2.DEVUDP.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.20

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.32

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SNA2.DEVUDP.FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

-0.43

+0.31

Drawdowns

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than VUDP.F's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA2.DE and VUDP.F.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SNA2.DEVUDP.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-2.16%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.01%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-1.97%

-12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-0.82%

-10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

—

—

Volatility

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SNA2.DEVUDP.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

2.34%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

2.34%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

2.34%

+5.61%

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNA2.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VUDP.F's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNA2.DE vs. VUDP.F - Dividend Comparison

SNA2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while VUDP.F has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SNA2.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist		3.50%3.74%3.48%3.07%1.40%0.72%1.32%
VUDP.F
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SNA2.DE and VUDP.F have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SNA2.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SNA2.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VUDP.F.

SNA2.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Core Bond, while VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SNA2.DE and 0.10% for VUDP.F.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNA2.DE and VUDP.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer