SNA vs. GLD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 10 years, SNA returned 12.41%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SNA vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SNA having a 12.41% annualized return and GLD not far behind at 12.15%.

SNA

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 8.47%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

GLD

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 6M: -2.25%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNA vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNA Snap-on Incorporated	13.93%	4.28%	20.67%	29.70%	8.91%	28.83%	4.03%	19.54%	-14.86%	3.64%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	-2.47%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	-4.15%	24.81%	17.86%	-1.94%	12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SNA and GLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004	0.02

The correlation between SNA and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNA vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNA

SNA Risk / Return Rank: 78
SNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SNA Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SNA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 26
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNA vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNA	GLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	0.87	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.24	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	0.98	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	2.81	+4.70

SNA vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNA and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNA vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and GLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNA	GLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-45.56%	-20.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	-24.46%	+15.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-24.46%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.77%	-24.46%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	-24.46%	-22.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-22.05%	+21.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-16.16%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	8.49%	-5.13%

Volatility

SNA vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 5.51%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNA	GLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	7.79%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	24.10%	-9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.36%	27.37%	-6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.91%	18.22%	+5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.18%	16.08%	+11.10%

Dividends

SNA vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNA Snap-on Incorporated	2.44%	2.57%	2.27%	2.33%	2.57%	2.37%	2.61%	2.32%	2.35%	1.69%	1.48%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNA and GLD in my portfolio?

SNA and GLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNA or GLD?

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to SNA (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNA dropped -65.76% vs GLD's -45.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.