PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SN vs. BE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SN vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SN achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 199.48% return.


SN

1D
-1.32%
1M
26.67%
YTD
19.57%
6M
18.75%
1Y
62.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BE

1D
4.56%
1M
-5.70%
YTD
199.48%
6M
173.97%
1Y
1,085.51%
3Y*
145.16%
5Y*
59.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SN vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SN
SharkNinja Inc.
19.57%14.93%90.27%74.33%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
199.48%291.22%50.07%-14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SN and BE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SN:

$19.05B

BE:

$83.19B

EPS

SN:

$4.96

BE:

$0.02

PE Ratio

SN:

26.97

BE:

11.33K

PS Ratio

SN:

3.67

BE:

27.91

PB Ratio

SN:

6.89

BE:

90.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

SN:

$5.18B

BE:

$2.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SN:

$3.22B

BE:

$761.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

SN:

$1.06B

BE:

$88.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SN vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SN
SN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SN vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.62

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

23.53

-21.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

73.01

-69.16

SN vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SN Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 10.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SN and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SN vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SN drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SN and BE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.64%

-92.54%

+49.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.23%

-45.94%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-15.48%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-51.91%

+42.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.61%

14.78%

-1.17%

Volatility

SN vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SharkNinja Inc. (SN) is 13.91%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 27.74%. This indicates that SN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.91%

27.74%

-13.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.21%

75.65%

-44.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.33%

107.62%

-65.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.51%

85.95%

-31.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.51%

95.68%

-41.17%

Dividends

SN vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SN nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SN
SharkNinja Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%

Financials

SN vs. BE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SharkNinja Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
751.05M
(SN) Total Revenue
(BE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SN and BE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to SN (13.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SN dropped -42.64% vs BE's -92.54%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SN and BE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer