PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMXAX vs. NEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Extended Market Index Fund (SMXAX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMXAX achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 59.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SMXAX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.37% annualized return.


SMXAX

1D
0.15%
1M
4.24%
YTD
13.08%
6M
13.41%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
12.27%

NEEGX

1D
4.73%
1M
16.94%
YTD
59.35%
6M
56.93%
1Y
97.40%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMXAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Extended Market Index Fund
13.08%12.61%16.45%24.55%-25.39%12.19%32.92%27.93%-9.08%18.23%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
59.35%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SMXAX and NEEGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

0.87

The correlation between SMXAX and NEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMXAX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMXAX
SMXAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SMXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SMXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Extended Market Index Fund (SMXAX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMXAXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

3.79

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

4.32

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

7.75

-4.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.12

26.32

-15.21

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMXAX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMXAXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.79

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.59

-0.04

Drawdowns

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMXAX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMXAX and NEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMXAXNEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-53.60%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-13.27%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-38.66%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.28%

-43.35%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-43.35%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-10.89%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.90%

-1.15%

Volatility

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Extended Market Index Fund (SMXAX) is 4.66%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that SMXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMXAXNEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

9.71%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

20.91%

-8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

27.12%

-10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.17%

28.30%

-6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

25.29%

-2.95%

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMXAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMXAX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

SMXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, more than NEEGX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
4.75%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%
SMXAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Extended Market Index Fund
9.76%10.96%12.66%1.72%4.38%18.92%2.78%3.98%6.49%5.19%3.44%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMXAX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEGX has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to SMXAX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMXAX dropped -41.48% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMXAX and NEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer