SMVTX vs. EDF

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

SMVTX (Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SMVTX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Virtus, while EDF is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX returned 11.84%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for EDF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMVTX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.

Performance

SMVTX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMVTX achieves a 19.51% return, which is significantly higher than EDF's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SMVTX has outperformed EDF with an annualized return of 11.84%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.05% annualized return.

SMVTX

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: 13.32%
• YTD: 19.51%
• 1Y: 33.59%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 11.84%

EDF

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: -4.00%
• 6M: 15.58%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 4.74%
• 10Y*: 4.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMVTX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund	19.51%	17.58%	18.93%	10.94%	-13.89%	29.15%	-1.19%	33.14%	-8.01%	11.69%
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	15.12%	22.24%	25.54%	21.63%	-27.96%	-8.47%	-31.14%	45.06%	-18.24%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SMVTX and EDF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2010	0.34

The correlation between SMVTX and EDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMVTX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMVTX

SMVTX Risk / Return Rank: 84
SMVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SMVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SMVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SMVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

EDF

EDF Risk / Return Rank: 50
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMVTX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMVTX	EDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.46	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.19	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	2.36	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.11	8.84	+7.28

SMVTX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMVTX and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMVTX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMVTX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVTX and EDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMVTX	EDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.72%	-64.23%	+9.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-9.44%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	-24.32%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-52.47%	+27.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.45%	-64.23%	+18.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.63%	-5.69%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-21.34%	+13.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.52%	-0.43%

Volatility

SMVTX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMVTX	EDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	5.68%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	12.72%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	15.33%	+0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	25.77%	-5.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	30.71%	-10.12%

SMVTX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMVTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMVTX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

SMVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.61%, more than EDF's 13.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	13.64%	14.49%	15.32%	16.71%	17.31%	12.91%	16.46%	15.67%	19.37%	13.58%	14.75%	17.93%
SMVTX Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund	14.61%	16.44%	15.96%	1.16%	6.75%	18.53%	2.52%	5.82%	14.47%	20.86%	3.61%	7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMVTX and EDF in my portfolio?

SMVTX and EDF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMVTX or EDF?

EDF has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to SMVTX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMVTX dropped -54.72% vs EDF's -64.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.