SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO
SMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged)) and XCHP.TO (iShares Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMVP.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index, while XCHP.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMVP.TO returned 12.68% vs 179.27% for XCHP.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XCHP.TO.
Performance
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMVP.TO achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than XCHP.TO's 120.01% return.
SMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCHP.TO
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- 15.93%
- YTD
- 120.01%
- 6M
- 117.26%
- 1Y
- 179.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 9.20% | 3.24% |
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF | 120.01% | 24.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMVP.TO and XCHP.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SMVP.TO and XCHP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SMVP.TO
XCHP.TO
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMVP.TO | XCHP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.62 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 12.69 | -10.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 42.11 | -37.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum XCHP.TO drawdown of -39.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVP.TO and XCHP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMVP.TO | XCHP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -39.06% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -14.22% | +7.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.88% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -8.16% | +5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.28% | -1.45% |
Volatility
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) (SMVP.TO) is 3.40%, while iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) has a volatility of 21.71%. This indicates that SMVP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMVP.TO | XCHP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 21.71% | -18.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 32.67% | -24.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 38.89% | -28.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 38.24% | -25.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 38.24% | -25.09% |
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHP.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMVP.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Dividend Comparison
SMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than XCHP.TO's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Dividend Index ETF (CAD Hedged) | 2.00% | 1.93% |
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMVP.TO and XCHP.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XCHP.TO.
SMVP.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XCHP.TO is Semiconductors. SMVP.TO tracks Solactive United States Dividend Elite Champions Index, while XCHP.TO tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SMVP.TO and 0.39% for XCHP.TO.
Find the right allocation for SMVP.TO and XCHP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer