SMU vs. OKTG
SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OKTG.
Performance
SMU vs. OKTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMU achieves a -84.70% return, which is significantly lower than OKTG's 110.88% return.
SMU
- 1D
- -16.70%
- 1M
- -44.43%
- 6M
- -90.92%
- YTD
- -84.70%
- 1Y
- -99.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKTG
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- 54.71%
- 6M
- 88.98%
- YTD
- 110.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMU vs. OKTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -84.70% | -65.45% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 110.88% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMU and OKTG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMU vs. OKTG — Risk / Return Rank
SMU
OKTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMU vs. OKTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMU | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMU vs. OKTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than OKTG's maximum drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and OKTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMU | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.35% | -60.69% | -38.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -9.20% | -90.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.19% | -22.77% | -55.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 83.46% | — | — |
Volatility
SMU vs. OKTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMU | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.44% | 133.12% | +66.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.29% | 133.12% | +67.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.29% | 133.12% | +67.17% |
SMU vs. OKTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than OKTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMU vs. OKTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMU nor OKTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMU and OKTG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.
SMU and OKTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 0.75% for OKTG.
Find the right allocation for SMU and OKTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer