SMU vs. NTSD
SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
SMU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMU
- 1D
- -16.70%
- 1M
- -44.43%
- 6M
- -90.92%
- YTD
- -84.70%
- 1Y
- -99.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | -72.77% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 18.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMU and NTSD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
SMU
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMU drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.35% | -5.58% | -93.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -1.28% | -98.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.19% | -1.13% | -77.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 83.46% | — | — |
Volatility
SMU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.44% | 23.24% | +176.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.29% | 23.24% | +177.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.29% | 23.24% | +177.05% |
SMU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
SMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.14% |
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SMU.
NTSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for SMU.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SMU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for SMU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer