SMTRX vs. TIBDX
SMTRX (ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMTRX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMTRX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIBDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMTRX and TIBDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMTRX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
SMTRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TIBDX
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMTRX drawdown since its inception was -0.62%, smaller than the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTRX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -18.82% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -1.54% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -2.30% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 3.88% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 5.64% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 4.74% | -1.10% |
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMTRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMTRX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
SMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than TIBDX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.46% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SMTRX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for SMTRX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer