PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTH vs. MNBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMTH vs. MNBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than MNBD's 1.33% return.


SMTH

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MNBD

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.31%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTH vs. MNBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
0.34%6.86%2.76%3.49%
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
1.33%5.15%2.41%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and MNBD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.68

The correlation between SMTH and MNBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMTH vs. MNBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMTH
MNBD

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-1.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

SMTH
100.0%
MNBD

-

Basic Materials

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Communication Services

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Consumer Defensive

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Financial Services

SMTH

-

MNBD
-1.0%

Healthcare

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Industrials

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Real Estate

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Technology

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Utilities

SMTH

-

MNBD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMTH vs. MNBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MNBD
MNBD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MNBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MNBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNBD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTH vs. MNBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTHMNBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.55

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.66

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

8.75

-3.04

SMTH vs. MNBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the MNBD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTH and MNBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTHMNBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.53

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. MNBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum MNBD drawdown of -5.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and MNBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTHMNBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-5.89%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.38%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.92%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-1.09%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.72%

+0.19%

Volatility

SMTH vs. MNBD - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) at 0.87%. This indicates that SMTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMTHMNBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.87%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

1.94%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

2.50%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

3.78%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

3.78%

+0.81%

SMTH vs. MNBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MNBD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMTH vs. MNBD - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than MNBD's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
3.32%3.32%3.83%3.44%2.40%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.40%4.46%4.58%0.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMTH and MNBD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTH has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to MNBD (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs MNBD's -5.89%.

On 1-year performance, MNBD leads with 6.31% vs 5.19% for SMTH. On fees, MNBD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MNBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MNBD has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MNBD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SMTH.

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.32% for MNBD.

SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while MNBD is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 0.50% for MNBD.

MNBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMTH and MNBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer