PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMTFX vs. SNGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Minnesota Tax Free Income Fund (SMTFX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTFX achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than SNGVX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SMTFX has outperformed SNGVX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while SNGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.56% annualized return.


SMTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.36%
6M
3.21%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.93%

SNGVX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.36%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMTFX
SIT Minnesota Tax Free Income Fund
2.36%5.74%4.05%2.87%-11.41%2.43%3.35%6.95%1.05%5.84%
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
0.31%6.93%2.41%3.22%-4.80%-1.15%3.53%3.34%1.80%1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTFX and SNGVX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.44

The correlation between SMTFX and SNGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMTFX vs. SNGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTFX
SMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SNGVX
SNGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SNGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SNGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Minnesota Tax Free Income Fund (SMTFX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMTFXSNGVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

1.45

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.19

2.17

+2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.27

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.85

+1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.26

5.73

+5.54

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the SNGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTFX and SNGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMTFXSNGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

1.45

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.34

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.53

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.46

-0.25

Drawdowns

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTFX drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, which is greater than SNGVX's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTFX and SNGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMTFXSNGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-9.17%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-2.41%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.73%

-4.04%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-9.17%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.34%

-9.17%

-7.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.45%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-0.83%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.78%

+0.13%

Volatility

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Minnesota Tax Free Income Fund (SMTFX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) at 1.09%. This indicates that SMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMTFXSNGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.09%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.17%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.03%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

3.72%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

2.97%

+1.29%

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMTFX and SNGVX have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

SMTFX vs. SNGVX - Dividend Comparison

SMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than SNGVX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMTFX
SIT Minnesota Tax Free Income Fund
3.16%4.29%3.23%1.75%2.18%2.30%2.59%3.06%3.17%3.04%3.13%3.28%
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
3.82%3.76%3.78%3.23%1.70%0.75%1.40%2.18%2.05%1.60%1.63%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMTFX and SNGVX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTFX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to SNGVX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTFX dropped -16.34% vs SNGVX's -9.17%.

SMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMTFX and SNGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer