SMT.L vs. LGGL.L
SMT.L (Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc) and LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SMT.L is actively managed, while LGGL.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMT.L returned 2.00%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for LGGL.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMT.L charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGL.L.
Performance
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMT.L is traded in GBp, while LGGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMT.L achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly higher than LGGL.L's 9.94% return.
SMT.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 18.50%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 37.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 19.16%
LGGL.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 26.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 18.50% | 24.72% | 18.75% | 12.46% | -45.71% | 10.46% | 110.49% | 24.76% | -4.77% |
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 9.94% | 12.55% | 21.28% | 18.77% | -8.29% | 23.09% | 12.93% | 22.15% | -6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMT.L and LGGL.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SMT.L and LGGL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMT.L
LGGL.L
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMT.L | LGGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.99 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 14.61 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMT.L drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than LGGL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMT.L and LGGL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMT.L | LGGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -25.97% | -34.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -6.59% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.05% | -19.24% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.11% | -19.24% | -40.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -1.31% | -7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -3.27% | -11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 1.81% | +2.17% |
Volatility
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Volatility Comparison
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that SMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMT.L | LGGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 3.86% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 9.42% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 11.95% | +8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.76% | 14.52% | +15.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 16.26% | +12.53% |
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMT.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGL.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMT.L vs. LGGL.L - Dividend Comparison
SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMT.L and LGGL.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford Funds and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for SMT.L and 0.10% for LGGL.L.
Find the right allocation for SMT.L and LGGL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer