SMST.L vs. TSLZ
SMST.L (Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past year, SMST.L returned 56.44% vs -65.33% for TSLZ. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMST.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMST.L is traded in GBP, while TSLZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLZ values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMST.L achieves a -67.74% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -2.85% return.
SMST.L
- 1D
- 5.07%
- 1M
- 144.67%
- YTD
- -67.74%
- 6M
- -49.77%
- 1Y
- 56.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -16.11%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -65.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMST.L Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP | -67.74% | 9,160.39% | -98.46% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -2.85% | -77.70% | -74.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMST.L and TSLZ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMST.L vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SMST.L
TSLZ
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMST.L | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.89 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | -0.86 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | -1.08 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMST.L | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | -0.71 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.67 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMST.L and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMST.L | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -99.18% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.24% | -76.43% | -16.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.93% | -99.06% | +7.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.49% | -75.95% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.05% | 60.42% | -12.37% |
Volatility
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP (SMST.L) has a higher volatility of 55.39% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.72%. This indicates that SMST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMST.L | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.39% | 24.72% | +30.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 177.15% | 56.60% | +120.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 203.45% | 93.10% | +110.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19,133.00% | 118.32% | +19,014.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19,133.00% | 118.32% | +19,014.68% |
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMST.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMST.L vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
SMST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMST.L Leverage Shares -3x Short MicroStrategy ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMST.L and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMST.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMST.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMST.L and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for SMST.L and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer