PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSNX vs. HILYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) and Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSNX achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than HILYX's 18.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSNX has underperformed HILYX with an annualized return of 2.81%, while HILYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


SMSNX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.95%
6M
-1.40%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
2.81%
ALL TIME*
2.88%

HILYX

1D
2.16%
1M
6.00%
6M
11.35%
YTD
18.21%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
11.62%
ALL TIME*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund
-0.21%13.62%4.17%12.59%-13.20%-4.23%2.56%11.52%-7.05%13.73%
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
18.21%44.76%0.28%19.84%-2.28%18.79%-5.94%18.28%-17.74%24.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSNX and HILYX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.51

The correlation between SMSNX and HILYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (10 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSNX vs. HILYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMSNX
SMSNX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SMSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HILYX
HILYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HILYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HILYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HILYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HILYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HILYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) and Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMSNXHILYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.01

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

11.64

-8.31

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the HILYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSNX and HILYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSNX drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum HILYX drawdown of -48.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSNX and HILYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSNXHILYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-48.29%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-11.31%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.77%

-14.04%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-25.58%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-48.29%

+22.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

0.00%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-8.10%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.92%

-0.74%

Volatility

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SMSNX) is 1.34%, while Hartford International Value Fund (HILYX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that SMSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HILYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSNXHILYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

4.05%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

11.78%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14%

14.06%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

15.15%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.50%

16.78%

-10.28%

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMSNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than HILYX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMSNX vs. HILYX - Dividend Comparison

SMSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than HILYX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HILYX
Hartford International Value Fund
4.91%5.80%0.00%2.67%2.84%3.22%2.08%3.05%8.24%6.97%5.23%3.55%
SMSNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund
5.59%5.36%4.90%6.53%5.85%4.68%5.07%5.27%5.74%7.37%4.78%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMSNX and HILYX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HILYX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SMSNX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMSNX dropped -25.77% vs HILYX's -48.29%.

HILYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSNX and HILYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer