SMSAX vs. SIEMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SMSAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund) and SIEMX (SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - SMSAX is a Multistrategy fund managed by SEI, while SIEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by SEI. Over the past 10 years, SMSAX returned 4.74%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for SIEMX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMSAX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for SIEMX.

Performance

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSAX achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than SIEMX's 27.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSAX has underperformed SIEMX with an annualized return of 4.74%, while SIEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.

SMSAX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 10.08%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 4.74%

SIEMX

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 9.56%
• YTD: 27.48%
• 6M: 30.59%
• 1Y: 56.23%
• 3Y*: 23.58%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMSAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund	6.73%	10.62%	6.42%	7.21%	-4.95%	1.47%	12.06%	4.85%	-3.68%	5.26%
SIEMX SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund	27.48%	35.90%	4.31%	9.81%	-21.51%	-1.85%	17.03%	19.76%	-18.67%	37.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSAX and SIEMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010	0.59

The correlation between SMSAX and SIEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMSAX vs. SIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSAX

SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SIEMX

SIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMSAX	SIEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	3.33	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	4.14	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.63	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	4.21	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.32	16.77	+2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the SIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSAX and SIEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMSAX	SIEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	3.33	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.42	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.03	0.57	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.28	+0.49

Drawdowns

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSAX drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum SIEMX drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSAX and SIEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMSAX	SIEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-65.22%	+54.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.66%	-13.59%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.93%	-16.41%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.72%	-37.68%	+27.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.98%	-40.76%	+29.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-21.45%	+19.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	3.42%	-2.57%

Volatility

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) is 1.91%, while SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that SMSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMSAX	SIEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	7.29%	-5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.26%	14.81%	-10.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.39%	17.65%	-12.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.66%	16.66%	-12.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.61%	17.50%	-12.89%

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMSAX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEMX's 1.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMSAX vs. SIEMX - Dividend Comparison

SMSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than SIEMX's 3.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIEMX SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund	3.38%	4.30%	3.20%	1.58%	2.08%	9.55%	0.53%	1.09%	0.63%	1.26%	0.80%	0.81%
SMSAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund	4.76%	5.08%	5.54%	4.35%	2.13%	7.61%	2.79%	1.01%	4.94%	2.20%	0.07%	2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMSAX and SIEMX in my portfolio?

SMSAX and SIEMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMSAX or SIEMX?

SIEMX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to SMSAX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMSAX dropped -10.98% vs SIEMX's -65.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.