PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMSAX vs. SCOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMSAX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than SCOAX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSAX has outperformed SCOAX with an annualized return of 4.80%, while SCOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


SMSAX

1D
0.56%
1M
3.09%
YTD
7.33%
6M
8.20%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
4.80%

SCOAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
7.33%10.62%6.42%7.21%-4.95%1.47%12.06%4.85%-3.68%5.26%
SCOAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
0.30%7.56%0.82%5.44%-14.84%-1.49%9.49%9.59%0.11%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SMSAX and SCOAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

-0.06

The correlation between SMSAX and SCOAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMSAX vs. SCOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMSAX
SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCOAX
SCOAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SCOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMSAXSCOAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

1.27

+1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.90

1.92

+2.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.23

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

1.89

+2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.00

5.69

+14.31

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMSAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the SCOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMSAX and SCOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMSAXSCOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.27

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

-0.04

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.37

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.25

+0.53

Drawdowns

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMSAX drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum SCOAX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSAX and SCOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMSAXSCOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-20.12%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-3.06%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.93%

-7.02%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.72%

-19.90%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.98%

-20.12%

+9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.80%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-5.46%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.02%

-0.17%

Volatility

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX) at 1.39%. This indicates that SMSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMSAXSCOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

1.39%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

2.87%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.40%

4.09%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.67%

6.36%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.61%

5.23%

-0.62%

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMSAX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCOAX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMSAX vs. SCOAX - Dividend Comparison

SMSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than SCOAX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCOAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
4.26%4.19%3.57%2.98%2.11%1.69%6.04%4.24%3.16%3.67%3.79%4.73%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
4.73%5.08%5.54%4.35%2.13%7.61%2.79%1.01%4.94%2.20%0.07%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMSAX and SCOAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMSAX has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to SCOAX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMSAX dropped -10.98% vs SCOAX's -20.12%.

SMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMSAX and SCOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer